At this point, I should probably just give SDMF a credit card and instructions to come back with a rifle. This is my most recent fascination. The Fieldcraft seems to be a lot more than just a copycat Kimber Montana. The similarities stop at “lightweight rifle with carbon fiber stock.”
The first thing that gets my attention is the enlarged muzzle for mounting a silencer. The more I learn about threading muzzles on lightweight barrels, the more I’ve learned that it’s “full retard” to put 7/16” threads on a long skinny barrel for the purposes of mounting a suppressor. Barrett came up with a simple solution:
Other points of interest:
- double stress relieved barrels that prevent accuracy from going to hell when the barrel heats up
- long box mags to accommodate longer bullets (3.02” for the short actions) and
- tight barrel twist rates
- 3 scope ring holes on the front ring so you can move the ring forward or back on the receiver to better accommodate your scope and eye relief
- larger scope ring base screws
- a more closed/angled grip
- one piece bolt held in place by intelligent seating and a pin
- room made throughout action so dirt has a place to go
- “perfect” feeding (according to Barrett)
- multiple reports of 6.5 CM being sub-MOA with pretty much any load you feed it
- stocks individually fitted and serialized to the action
There’s some other stuff. I’ll update the OP when my memory is jogged.
The first thing that gets my attention is the enlarged muzzle for mounting a silencer. The more I learn about threading muzzles on lightweight barrels, the more I’ve learned that it’s “full retard” to put 7/16” threads on a long skinny barrel for the purposes of mounting a suppressor. Barrett came up with a simple solution:
Other points of interest:
- double stress relieved barrels that prevent accuracy from going to hell when the barrel heats up
- long box mags to accommodate longer bullets (3.02” for the short actions) and
- tight barrel twist rates
- 3 scope ring holes on the front ring so you can move the ring forward or back on the receiver to better accommodate your scope and eye relief
- larger scope ring base screws
- a more closed/angled grip
- one piece bolt held in place by intelligent seating and a pin
- room made throughout action so dirt has a place to go
- “perfect” feeding (according to Barrett)
- multiple reports of 6.5 CM being sub-MOA with pretty much any load you feed it
- stocks individually fitted and serialized to the action
There’s some other stuff. I’ll update the OP when my memory is jogged.
Last edited: