Property Tax Petition

Are you in favor of eliminating property taxes?

  • Yes

    Votes: 115 74.2%
  • No

    Votes: 40 25.8%

  • Total voters
    155

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,157
Likes
2,441
Points
758
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
Services, what services. I live off a gravel road that gets plowed maybe a couple times a year. Rural fire department 20 minutes away, police the one time my wife called because some women that was trying to get in the house and she was alone with the kids, She was told an officer would be there in 20/30 minutes, I made it home in less than 10. Rural and well water, septic system, garbage from private contractor. So tell me how I could get less services from the county.

As far as our price for services we provide we shop for the lowest cost on materials and try to keep our labor and other costs under control. when things get tight we cut back but when things get tight the government raises taxes on the citizens without a care if the citizens can afford the increase or not and rarely do they cut back If ever.

That doesn't answer my question.
 


lunkerslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
21,378
Likes
5,815
Points
983
Location
Cavalier, ND
Yeah I'm mistaken on the loan forgiveness in grand forks it was actually east grand forks that had forgiveness of loan after a certain time. I stand corrected
 

Obi-Wan

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
9,462
Likes
6,750
Points
933
Location
Bismarck
That doesn't answer my question.
You missed the point on the original post where they are spending the money not because it is a necessity they are spending the money because if they don’t they lose it and risk getting a lower budget the next year. There is no incentive in government to reduce costs. But you are one of the government employees that don’t need to turn a profit with zero incentive to reduce costs.
 

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,157
Likes
2,441
Points
758
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
No, you are missing the point.

I would expect that over the years the cost of one unit of whatever good you provide the city of Bismarck to have increased in cost. How has that cost been reflected in your contracts over the years? Have those goods increased with roughly the same inflationary percentage as your property taxes? Or, has the difference between the two been remarkable?

It goes to the ultimate point of if we have some reason to think the cost of goods that private industry provides to the various levels of government are free from the effects of inflation. Inflationary pressures aren't just reflected in one's personal finances, they are very real in what the population expects of government. Are the hourly operation and overall maintenance costs of a road grader today the same as they were in 2020, probably not. Yet we still expect our county gravel roads to be graded on a regular basis.

Shit, I upgraded from a 2009 F250 to a 2021 F250 last year. I was floored that an oil change including fuel filter replacement went from $330'ish to $621 on the newer truck. EVERYTHING costs more with time, it's our job to prepare for that.
 

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,157
Likes
2,441
Points
758
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
You missed the point on the original post where they are spending the money not because it is a necessity they are spending the money because if they don’t they lose it and risk getting a lower budget the next year. There is no incentive in government to reduce costs. But you are one of the government employees that don’t need to turn a profit with zero incentive to reduce costs.

FWIW, does that happen in govt, with the concept of spend it or lose it, I am sure it does to some extent. But let's not exaggerate the extent of it.

For the record, I don't think we taxpayers would appreciate government employees wanting their agency to produce a profit. That would mean they are overcharging the public for the goods and services they provide.
 


Trip McNeely

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
2,129
Likes
1,810
Points
553
Location
Burleigh county
You guys don’t have to fight about it anymore….I’m sure they’ll fix it all by next time. This 65% vote proved the people aren’t happy with the current system and sent a message if we don’t get tax relief they will be held to account ...rofl...
Thats what we all said last time…… better start stretching your assholes….then we can repeat this process with a not so shitty written measure that addresses simply primary residence with clear and detailed language.
 

Trip McNeely

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
2,129
Likes
1,810
Points
553
Location
Burleigh county
Easy solution. Freeze the tax evaluation at what you paid for the property. If you want to buy a $600,000 house then you can pay taxes on that. Why should some elderly people pay a tax evaluation on a property they have bought and paid for that was purchased for $80,000 and now some pointy head says it’s worth $300,000 so they pay tax on that. It’s stupid. If there is a short fall in revenue, the govt can tighten there belts instead of coming up with pet projects no one wants. I know it’s wishful thinking but a normal business has to cut spending when the income is short. Why is govt different.
This is legitimately a really good idea. Most are aware they need to pay some tax. The problem is when your taxes go up hundreds of dollars yearly and quadruple over 10 years. No one takes that into account when they purchase a home 10-15 years ago. When you take out a mortgage ypu see the taxes and that’s what it is. You know up front what it is and that’s where it should stay. I started at 1250 and Im approaching 4k. It’s not right.
 

Trip McNeely

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
2,129
Likes
1,810
Points
553
Location
Burleigh county
FWIW, does that happen in govt, with the concept of spend it or lose it, I am sure it does to some extent. But let's not exaggerate the extent of it.

For the record, I don't think we taxpayers would appreciate government employees wanting their agency to produce a profit. That would mean they are overcharging the public for the goods and services they provide.
You mean like the bank of ND? Or the state mill? Or is that different cuz it goes to the general fund?
 

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
11,157
Likes
2,441
Points
758
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
You mean like the bank of ND? Or the state mill? Or is that different cuz it goes to the general fund?

Well, ya got me on that one. Those two were setup to specifically benefit ND and its economy, so that's a tweener when it comes to making money. As a general rule of thumb, fees collected go to the general fund and not back into the budget/pocket of agency employees.
 

NDSportsman

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 26, 2015
Posts
3,513
Likes
936
Points
393
Location
East Central ND
Services, what services. I live off a gravel road that gets plowed maybe a couple times a year. Rural fire department 20 minutes away, police the one time my wife called because some women that was trying to get in the house and she was alone with the kids, She was told an officer would be there in 20/30 minutes, I made it home in less than 10. Rural and well water, septic system, garbage from private contractor. So tell me how I could get less services from the county.

As far as our price for services we provide we shop for the lowest cost on materials and try to keep our labor and other costs under control. when things get tight we cut back but when things get tight the government raises taxes on the citizens without a care if the citizens can afford the increase or not and rarely do they cut back If ever.
This.

My property taxes have increase because of the school district and property evaluation. Barely any increase for services that are actually beneficial to me like county and township expenses for road maintenance. This BS about local services is a bunch of crap!
 


SLE

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 25, 2016
Posts
1,184
Likes
356
Points
263
Thats what we all said last time…… better start stretching your assholes….then we can repeat this process with a not so shitty written measure that addresses simply primary residence with clear and detailed language.

This^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
 

woodduck30

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Thread starter
Joined
Nov 8, 2022
Posts
900
Likes
1,304
Points
293
Here is the poll for eliminating propert tax. 74% to eliminate it on this site.

The public was damn near that on keeping the tax. Polls as you can see don't equate to shit when the boogie man is out there.
 

jer79

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 7, 2015
Posts
483
Likes
918
Points
280
Here is the poll for eliminating propert tax. 74% to eliminate it on this site.

The public was damn near that on keeping the tax. Polls as you can see don't equate to shit when the boogie man is out there.
It was a poorly written bill. It should have been for primary residence only.... it absolutely would have passed. But of course the farmers have to have better than everyone else and the deep pocket buddies with commercial land and buildings couldn't just stand idly by and see someone getting a break without them getting a bigger break. So that poorly written bill is what we voted on. It's clear now how they are arguing over tax relief, if the farmers and the guys with money don't come out more ahead, fuck the rest of you it's not gonna happen. Also the disatisfaction over your property tax seems to be guys from dickinson,bismarck,prob fargo and several other cities i'm sure. Some people (a few that have commented on what is now 3 separate threads) that they are fine with what is going on in their county/town.... maybe this is a YOU problem not a US problem. Maybe u guys are just trying to make the rest of the state pay for your local misgovernances.
Boogie man, never heard of her. we dont have cable, seldom hear or listen to local radio. . i edited this post , the graph i posted was cumulative property tax revenue over x amount of years.
 
Last edited:

woodduck30

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Thread starter
Joined
Nov 8, 2022
Posts
900
Likes
1,304
Points
293
Nice speech. I live rural, not in a city. My concern is with greedy politicians taking our money. Property tax is theft. I really don't care if it benefits my neighbor or the farmer down the road. I will not cut my nose off to spite my face. I'm not that guy.

The boogie man can tell you it was poorly written. All I know is that it eliminated the theft of property tax.
 


jer79

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 7, 2015
Posts
483
Likes
918
Points
280
Nice speech. I live rural, not in a city. My concern is with greedy politicians taking our money. Property tax is theft. I really don't care if it benefits my neighbor or the farmer down the road. I will not cut my nose off to spite my face. I'm not that guy.

The boogie man can tell you it was poorly written. All I know is that it eliminated the theft of property tax.
thanks for noticing.
 

Fester

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 15, 2018
Posts
2,064
Likes
1,781
Points
518
Location
Space
It was a poorly written bill. It should have been for primary residence only.... it absolutely would have passed. But of course the farmers have to have better than everyone else and the deep pocket buddies with commercial land and buildings couldn't just stand idly by and see someone getting a break without them getting a bigger break. So that poorly written bill is what we voted on. It's clear now how they are arguing over tax relief, if the farmers and the guys with money don't come out more ahead, fuck the rest of you it's not gonna happen. Also the disatisfaction over your property tax seems to be guys from dickinson,bismarck,prob fargo and several other cities i'm sure. Some people (a few that have commented on what is now 3 separate threads) that they are fine with what is going on in their county/town.... maybe this is a YOU problem not a US problem. Maybe u guys are just trying to make the rest of the state pay for your local misgovernances.
Boogie man, never heard of her. we dont have cable, seldom hear or listen to local radio. . i edited this post , the graph i posted was cumulative property tax revenue over x amount of years.
You have to also understand some of these people live off your/my taxes and will post they love it just because of that. It amazes me when people love other people spending their money...hard for me to undestand that.
 

Trip McNeely

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
2,129
Likes
1,810
Points
553
Location
Burleigh county
It was a poorly written bill. It should have been for primary residence only.... it absolutely would have passed. But of course the farmers have to have better than everyone else and the deep pocket buddies with commercial land and buildings couldn't just stand idly by and see someone getting a break without them getting a bigger break. So that poorly written bill is what we voted on. It's clear now how they are arguing over tax relief, if the farmers and the guys with money don't come out more ahead, fuck the rest of you it's not gonna happen. Also the disatisfaction over your property tax seems to be guys from dickinson,bismarck,prob fargo and several other cities i'm sure. Some people (a few that have commented on what is now 3 separate threads) that they are fine with what is going on in their county/town.... maybe this is a YOU problem not a US problem. Maybe u guys are just trying to make the rest of the state pay for your local misgovernances.
Boogie man, never heard of her. we dont have cable, seldom hear or listen to local radio. . i edited this post , the graph i posted was cumulative property tax revenue over x amount of years.
Yea….. no…..we let them divide, so that we all lose.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 3
  • This month: 2
  • This month: 2
  • This month: 1
  • This month: 1
  • This month: 1
  • This month: 1
  • This month: 1
  • This month: 1
  • This month: 1
Top Bottom