Sb 2315 - reborn after house gutting!

Reprobait

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Posts
3,224
Likes
957
Points
398
Who is standing up for the shore fishermen. I have fished areas that would become iffy if this passed. How would you know for sure? Water level dependent?
 


njsimonson

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Aug 17, 2015
Posts
274
Likes
3
Points
115
Location
Capital City, ND
Who is standing up for the shore fishermen. I have fished areas that would become iffy if this passed. How would you know for sure? Water level dependent?

If 2315 passes, there is no IF at all - shoreline would be off limits to anglers without express permission (think Devils Lake Coulees in spring). If you want to get into wade fishing and "navigable waterways" like is the case in many states...that might be a different story, but I'm not versed much in that side of the law here in ND.
 

Walleye_Chaser

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 16, 2015
Posts
2,139
Likes
162
Points
303
Location
Fargo
Who is standing up for the shore fishermen. I have fished areas that would become iffy if this passed. How would you know for sure? Water level dependent?

This was a big point I made in my emails. I shore fish A LOT. Almost all of my spots would be No Tresspass. Such a complete shit show. They should honestly be embarrassed with themselves with this mess.
 

Migrator Man

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Posts
3,968
Likes
26
Points
261
If 2315 passes, there is no IF at all - shoreline would be off limits to anglers without express permission (think Devils Lake Coulees in spring). If you want to get into wade fishing and "navigable waterways" like is the case in many states...that might be a different story, but I'm not versed much in that side of the law here in ND.
The state just passed a bill that wants to reduce the number of so called “navigable waterways” and if the state engineer can’t justify keeping them then the automatically lose their title. Just another secret bill that was passed behind our backs. You can’t fish below the ordinary high water mark on those waterways but no fishing on land will be allowed on every other body of water unless you have permission to be on the unposted land. Huge impact to the devils lake region.

- - - Updated - - -

https://www.jamestownsun.com/news/government-and-politics/4603055-north-dakota-legislators-vote-require-state-review-rivers-other

- - - Updated - - -

And another stupid law the legislature wasted their time on.....
https://www.jamestownsun.com/news/government-and-politics/4603359-loud-nighttime-boaters-face-fines-under-bill-approved-burgum
 


Pheasant 54

★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Nov 21, 2018
Posts
469
Likes
189
Points
145
in looking at which house members voted yes on this the first time, I find it amazing that Grand Forks, Minot and Bismarck each had (2) that voted yes , so did one of the Devils lake people and one from Williston
 

Bed Wetter

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2015
Posts
7,094
Likes
436
Points
368
Location
Cold
Sent emails a couple hours ago. Thanks again for keeping us informed on this.
 

skywalker

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Dec 1, 2015
Posts
172
Likes
5
Points
113
Location
Bismarck
This morning I emailed my District 30 representatives and here is what I got. Mike Nathe replied, " I voted No the first time, and I will vote No again" Thanks for contacting me with your concerns. He will get my vote again next time. I have not received a response from either Glenn Bosch or Diane Larson. They will NOT get my vote next time their term is up, as neither one even acknowledged my email. They will get another email from me in the morning stating that if they haven't responded by 8:00 am
 

guywhofishes

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 21, 2015
Posts
29,383
Likes
6,252
Points
1,108
Location
Faaargo, ND
hey - where's our resident 2315 supporter been?

busy helping in the SB sausage factory?

- - - Updated - - -

The state just passed a bill that wants to reduce the number of so called “navigable waterways” and if the state engineer can’t justify keeping them then the automatically lose their title. Just another secret bill that was passed behind our backs. You can’t fish below the ordinary high water mark on those waterways but no fishing on land will be allowed on every other body of water unless you have permission to be on the unposted land. Huge impact to the devils lake region.

- - - Updated - - -

https://www.jamestownsun.com/news/government-and-politics/4603055-north-dakota-legislators-vote-require-state-review-rivers-other

- - - Updated - - -

And another stupid law the legislature wasted their time on.....
https://www.jamestownsun.com/news/government-and-politics/4603359-loud-nighttime-boaters-face-fines-under-bill-approved-burgum

SOB!!!!
 

Wags2.0

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Sep 4, 2018
Posts
1,514
Likes
19
Points
191
hey - where's our resident 2315 supporter been?

busy helping in the SB sausage factory?

him and gabriel are holding hands at the vote

- - - Updated - - -

pickup left on in the parking lot. Burning red diesel.

- - - Updated - - -

lol jk

- - - Updated - - -

kinda
 


Migrator Man

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Posts
3,968
Likes
26
Points
261
If 2315 passes, there is no IF at all - shoreline would be off limits to anglers without express permission (think Devils Lake Coulees in spring). If you want to get into wade fishing and "navigable waterways" like is the case in many states...that might be a different story, but I'm not versed much in that side of the law here in ND.
Sounds like the wildlife societies are commending senator eberle for the compromises between sportsmen and landowner groups? So are they giving up on fighting for fishing access rights?
 

PrairieGhost

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,573
Likes
1,146
Points
543
Location
Drifting the high plains
They are trying to turn our sport into another business to benefit landowners. Landowners in Montana were upset a few years ago when their legislature passed a bill allowing fishermen to float river that flowed through their property. In North Dakota we need to remain vigilant that our legislature doesn't take even more from us.
 

Uncle Jimbo

★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Jul 24, 2016
Posts
464
Likes
6
Points
118
Location
ND
Daryl Leis of ND Farm Bureau is on 550 AM now talking about a “ND Lockout” where landowners are vowing to not allow anyone but family, friends and nonresident hunters on their land if SB2315 fails. He claimed over 1 million acres have been pledged to be closed to hunters via this and another (name or org I missed) “lockout”.

The proponents must be getting desperate! Wonder if Fritz has been out helping his buddy Daryl gather lockout pledges?
 

Kurtr

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
18,906
Likes
3,163
Points
883
Location
Mobridge,Sd
If anyone needs permission I will ask for you since I am nr should be good to go.
 


You

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 30, 2015
Posts
1,467
Likes
30
Points
196
Location
In front.
Daryl Leis of ND Farm Bureau is on 550 AM now talking about a “ND Lockout” where landowners are vowing to not allow anyone but family, friends and nonresident hunters on their land if SB2315 fails. He claimed over 1 million acres have been pledged to be closed to hunters via this and another (name or org I missed) “lockout”.

The proponents must be getting desperate! Wonder if Fritz has been out helping his buddy Daryl gather lockout pledges?

So that's a declaration of war on his fellow resident hunters correct? Remember, this is not a property rights bill, this is an anti-hunting bill.

I listen to Trent Loos darn near every day on AM550. He says farmers aren't winning the war on numbers/votes. People like Daryl seem to be working to lose some of their biggest allies? Why? This is so strange to me.
 

PrairieGhost

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
10,573
Likes
1,146
Points
543
Location
Drifting the high plains
Daryl Leis of ND Farm Bureau is on 550 AM now talking about a “ND Lockout” where landowners are vowing to not allow anyone but family, friends and nonresident hunters on their land if SB2315 fails. He claimed over 1 million acres have been pledged to be closed to hunters via this and another (name or org I missed) “lockout”.

The proponents must be getting desperate! Wonder if Fritz has been out helping his buddy Daryl gather lockout pledges?
I would be willing to bet 95% of those joining a lockout have had their land posted tight for years. Meanwhile they enjoyed our support that good landowners earned, and bought larger mailboxes for all their gov checks.
 

8andcounting

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Nov 12, 2015
Posts
1,336
Likes
72
Points
228
I would be willing to bet 95% of those joining a lockout have had their land posted tight for years. Meanwhile they enjoyed our support that good landowners earned, and bought larger mailboxes for all their gov checks.

Exactly .... let em lock it out . Be no different , been posted for years
 

Bed Wetter

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2015
Posts
7,094
Likes
436
Points
368
Location
Cold
Heard back from one rep. Sounds like she’s flipped and will be a “yes” now.
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 301
  • This month: 300
  • This month: 91
  • This month: 86
  • This month: 70
  • This month: 55
  • This month: 51
  • This month: 47
  • This month: 44
  • This month: 42
Top Bottom