Walleye length limits on big 3

Bfishn

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Dec 7, 2015
Posts
3,943
Likes
420
Points
368
Where does the small fish line stop. That isnt a problem across the border
Not sure but I think the natural reproduction in the river has been more than enough to supply the ND stretch of river/oahe. I think we have more of a forage problem up here, where I don’t think that’s an issue down there.
 


johnr

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
21,801
Likes
8,079
Points
948
Location
Dickinson
Me and everyone I fish with, never keeps under 14" unless its a bad hook or something that makes the fish not returnable to the water. We also never keep over 22-23", again unless it is effd up and not returnable.
God will make more fish, anyone who keeps bigger for the table, have at it, just not what anyone I know does.
 

wslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 12, 2015
Posts
3,588
Likes
1,485
Points
503
Under 16" or over 21" go back. Got tape marks on my rods for quick measure.
 

Riggen&Jiggen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 6, 2015
Posts
538
Likes
28
Points
203
Location
Burlington
Google ( Why does Lake Oahe have a 1 over 20 inch walleye size limit). Oahe has 3 main forage - Smelt, Emerald Shinners and Gizzard Shad. Sak mainly has 1 forage - Smelt and a few cisco. Do you think you would have a better chance at a 13 plus lb walleye in Lake Oahe/Missouri River or Sak? Point is that more Teener walleye are being caught in Oahe/MO river up to the Garrison dam than there are in Sak. Main reason I believe this is happening is that the SD F&G are actively managing the system for both a healthy fishery and big fish potential by instilling the 1 over 20" size restriction and adding different bait forage. I find it funny how our ND G&F is basically saying they keep fishing regulations simple so people don't get confused. That is just an excuse to save the dept. money so they don't have to spend more time checking peoples catches. I agree with what they say about the health of the fisheries in ND but it would be nice to have Sak managed to produce more teener sized walleye.
 


ND58201

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jun 8, 2015
Posts
211
Likes
95
Points
182
Google ( Why does Lake Oahe have a 1 over 20 inch walleye size limit). Oahe has 3 main forage - Smelt, Emerald Shinners and Gizzard Shad. Sak mainly has 1 forage - Smelt and a few cisco. Do you think you would have a better chance at a 13 plus lb walleye in Lake Oahe/Missouri River or Sak? Point is that more Teener walleye are being caught in Oahe/MO river up to the Garrison dam than there are in Sak. Main reason I believe this is happening is that the SD F&G are actively managing the system for both a healthy fishery and big fish potential by instilling the 1 over 20" size restriction and adding different bait forage. I find it funny how our ND G&F is basically saying they keep fishing regulations simple so people don't get confused. That is just an excuse to save the dept. money so they don't have to spend more time checking peoples catches. I agree with what they say about the health of the fisheries in ND but it would be nice to have Sak managed to produce more teener sized walleye.
So what happens when 12-13lb are common? You will bitch to further Restrict and make more15lbers? There are already fish in Sak this size. If you are a great fisherman go out and catch one. Or are you just looking for an easy “teener” ? I think they have done a great thing with Sak. Helps that there aren’t as many non res willing to drive out there. east/central lakes are another story
 

Rowdie

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Posts
19,546
Likes
14,694
Points
983
SDGFP admitted years ago the 1 over 20 was a feel good rule to appease the guides and based on any real data.
 

KDM

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 20, 2015
Posts
10,087
Likes
3,459
Points
863
Location
Valley City
Fishermen will NEVER be happy......EVER. Regardless of any regulations or limitations. If they catch a limit, the fish should have been bigger. If they catch a limit of bigger fish, they could have caught them faster. If they catch a limit of big fish in 5 minutes, they could have caught them closer to the dock. It never ends. Same with deer hunters. Not enough bucks. Lots of bucks, but they're small. Lots of big bucks, but it takes to much work to get'em. Blah Blah Blah. That's why this site exists. So every year we of the peanut gallery can vent, argue, and blow off steam about the same issues. It's great!! Carry On!!
 

zoops

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 17, 2015
Posts
1,969
Likes
371
Points
333
Walleye fishing in ND has never been better than it has been the last 10 years or so. Oahe has billions of walleyes and plenty of big ones so it doesn't appear any tweaking is needed. We have water right now, we might as well use it. If sak goes down to 1810 again, having a slot limit right now isn't going to help.
 


NodakBob

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 27, 2022
Posts
624
Likes
796
Points
280
Location
bismarck
Fishermen will NEVER be happy......EVER. Regardless of any regulations or limitations. If they catch a limit, the fish should have been bigger. If they catch a limit of bigger fish, they could have caught them faster. If they catch a limit of big fish in 5 minutes, they could have caught them closer to the dock. It never ends. Same with deer hunters. Not enough bucks. Lots of bucks, but they're small. Lots of big bucks, but it takes to much work to get'em. Blah Blah Blah. That's why this site exists. So every year we of the peanut gallery can vent, argue, and blow off steam about the same issues. It's great!! Carry On!!
Not me, I’m an optimist, not a xl pessimist. I’m usually just dang glad to be alive and fishing…
 

Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 60
  • This month: 15
  • This month: 14
  • This month: 12
  • This month: 10
  • This month: 9
  • This month: 8
  • This month: 7
  • This month: 6
  • This month: 6
Top Bottom