This is the kind of gold I expect out of this page. Beauty!
What about the local kid who scouted the field and brought his grandpa? Should we make sure we don’t allow him to hunt in ND either?I wouldn't want him hunting in the same state. We have enough problems of our own with hunter/landowner relations we don't need him coming in and pissing more people off.
No one deserves death threats but what do you expect after acting like that? KarmaWhat are you a moderator? This has to be outdone now to get views. This farmer has been publicly doxed. He’s getting death threats. Can you grasp that gravity? Does he deserve that for giving a butt chewing?
What about the local kid who scouted the field and brought his grandpa? Should we make sure we don’t allow him to hunt in ND either?
Why so you can chew their ass without being on camera for hunting on someone else’s land? Why are you so worried about video if you are not doing anything wrong?They 100% posted that to get views and drive controversy. I make sure no one brings a camera near my land after this. If other land owners are smart they will do the same.
Sick of what? People hunting your neighbors land? Yeah that must get exhausting patrolling land that is not yours!Absolutely not, I don’t condone the whole monetary extortion. That’s wrong. I would never even go out there. I would just call the game and fish. I’m just a tired old farmer that is sick of this stuff, venting.
You must be involved in this if you know whether the landowner that gave them permission to hunt didn’t also give them permission to film. Welcome to the site Jeff. Making yourself look like a bigger ass!You need permission to film on private property. CCTV is either the private owners camera or the police. If the kids had permission to film a YouTube show they are fine. But if they just had permission to hunt I would expect the video to get tossed. Evidence has to be obtained legally. Or are you saying if I give someone permission to hunt they can film, drive the tractor, and take a cow home? According to YouTube policy the kids needed permission from the landowner to film the video and then they would need permission from the angry one to post it because it’s not a public domain.
Nope, I even stated if they got permission to film they would be good. I think both parties are nuts, someone said it best sometimes morons cross paths. The thing that makes me upset is that with all these news stories we only get half of the info. We obviously saw what the farmer did, but it’s the other half that often gets missed.You must be involved in this if you know whether the landowner that gave them permission to hunt didn’t also give them permission to film. Welcome to the site Jeff. Making yourself look like a bigger ass!
You are finally realizing that both sides might be morons! I’m not a fan of the MN kid either but doesn’t excuse the actions of the landowner.Nope, I even stated it they got permission to film they would be good. I think both parties are nuts, someone said it best sometimes morons cross paths. The thing that makes me upset is that with all these news stories we only get half of the info. We obviously saw what the farmer did, but it’s the other half that often gets missed.
Kind of hard to make the MN kid out to be the bad guy when you ignore the fact that this guy was chewing out a local kid and his grandpa.I know nothing about the kid and his grandpa or their involvement.
I said right off the bat that I wouldn't stick up for either of them , and I haven't .Kind of hard to make the MN kid out to be the bad guy when you ignore the fact that this guy was chewing out a local kid and his grandpa.