Crazy Hunter Harassment Duck Hunting In North Dakota (Game Warden Involved!)

[deleted member]

truth on the cost thing v. going to trial. you can't get an hours worth of an attorney's time for the $250 court costs that it cost to close this case.

 

[shorthairsrus]

so the sota kid gets nothing but a check from youtubE?

 

[Kurtr]

so the sota kid gets nothing but a check from youtubE?

ya found a picture of him swimming in all the money he made

 

[deleted member]

if i recall, i never saw an advertisement in his video. therefore, he would have gotten absolutely $0.00 from facebook.

 

[johnr]

I wonder if that angry old man is still watching his corn fields like a hawk.

 

[Shockwave]

I wonder if that angry old man is still watching his corn fields like a hawk.

One way to find out.

 

[FightingSioux]

No clue, I sure as hell wouldn't plead guilty if actually innocent. Just more evidence this whole ordeal is what happens when dickheads cross paths. Looks like Jeffy goes to court in April

Cheaper to pay $250 fine and a slap on the wrist then spend money to fight it. Unless someone is paying my lawyer bill I may have done the same.

 

[bucksnbears]

Bout 25 years ago, I had a guy become "Erman" on me by Medora.
Shot a 120ish whitetail with my bow. Guy was super happy till he seen it was a whitetail.
He became just as uncunted as Jeff.

 

[Hunter58301]

I sure hate the language in that order. If they wanted to fk with someone they sure could. Just because I store my guns at a relatives doesn't mean I don't own them. Seems unconstitutional to me.

And guaranteed hassle every time he tries to purchase a firearm

 

[deleted member]

Not likely after June 28^^^ honestly, possibly not even today

 

[TFX 186]

So, I watched the video but missed the part where anyone who was hunting, trespassed. Why was the kid written up for trespass? Did I miss something in this whole fiasco? I was thinking after watching video that they were in the clear for trespass.
Fish On!

 

[PrairieGhost]

So, I watched the video but missed the part where anyone who was hunting, trespassed. Why was the kid written up for trespass? Did I miss something in this whole fiasco? I was thinking after watching video that they were in the clear for trespass.
Fish On!

I dont think the kid did trespass, but now the court can find him innocent and Erman can't hate on the warden or the Game and Fish.

 

[deleted member]

the complaint says he was told not to "go near jeff's land" or some shit like that and since he was very near jeff's land, he was technically on a part of the land he was legally on but that he was not supposed to be on. frankly, i've touched on this before. but, seems like complete bullshit to me. and if those charges were filed just to appease mr. erman, then there are other issues i care not to discuss on a website.

btw PG, he pled to it already in case you missed that part of this thread

 

[TFX 186]

I kinda thought I smelled a big steaming pile too. I am wondering why this kid was picked out of all the hunters? I can about here the conversation, Let's file a charge on this kid who has been in trouble before, he won't have the will or the means to fight it with his background, and we will get a guilty plea to make everyone happy. @espringers please correct me if I'm wrong or really reaching here.
Fish On!

 

[deleted member]

He was the one who got permission and was told "don't go near Jeff's land" or whatever. Since that statement was specifically told to him and nobody else, they charged just him.

 

[johnr]

He was the one who got permission and was told "don't go near Jeff's land" or whatever. Since that statement was specifically told to him and nobody else, they charged just him.

One can get in trouble for going "near" someone's land?
WTF

I am telling you all right now to not go near my land, there you have been told and will be prosecuted iffn any of you even do a drive by...

 

[riverview]

warden and judge keeping the locals somewhat in the right is my guess. total B/S if you ask me.

 

[deleted member]

i would have liked to see who would have blinked first if they actually set this for jury trial. it absolutely doesn't seem like a winnable case for the state imho. but, i have to wonder if she would have taken it to trial anyway for the reason stated directly above ^^^^ or if she would have eventually dismissed it. if the latter, at what point?

 

[Obi-Wan]

i would have liked to see who would have blinked first if they actually set this for jury trial. it absolutely doesn't seem like a winnable case for the state imho. but, i have to wonder if she would have taken it to trial anyway for the reason stated directly above ^^^^ or if she would have eventually dismissed it. if the latter, at what point?

How much different would it have been if the land owner said " you can hunt my land but stay away from section 16 " and the hunter went on section 16 ? He was given permission to hunt with instructions where not to hunt. I assume the land owner had part in the trespass citation

 

[Freedom]

I guess I hate money more than most. He pled guilty if he truly was innocent that's unfortunate. Seems pleading guilty would be a gift to Jeffy's lawyer.