KC is the best viable option for giving the vikes a chance to win games and because statistically he is a consistent qb compared to other qbs in the league and for a vikes fan that's better then qbs we have had in the past.and if you play a bunch of .500 teams, twice a year and are "half" way decent shouldn't you do better than average?
Check the numbers lol
The bears suck year after year,
Until recently the Lions were even worse.
The Pack has never been Back.
Keenum was not a regular consistent starting qb option, look at his carreer stats before coming to Minnesota. The vikes had an exceptional team with a top league defense but you forget that Aaron was out for the season with a Anthony Barr season ending broken collar bone, We lost Teddy in 2016 forcing the team to give the eagles top draft picks for sam Bradford only to lose him in 17 for Casey keenum, also you forgot the most important reason Minnesota did as well as we did in 17 and that we had the #1 defense that year. The vikes took a gamble in 18 and perhaps in hindsight we paid a lot for a qb we thought would give our team that was coached by a defensive minded staff a chance to make another run for a nfc title, we were dealt some shitty cards when it came to season ending qbs because of a coaching staff who spent all their pennies on a top zimmer league defense. Look it up KC was the best prospect for us in 18 to get back to a nfc championship but we lost AP, Kalil, and Patterson to free agency.
Last edited: