Property Tax Credit

johnr

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
20,663
Likes
5,286
Points
913
Location
Dickinson
I would not let them into my house, however mrs johnr did, and then she called me while they were touring my house, I asked her to put me on the speaker phone, and screamed get out of my house.
mrs johnr apologized, and let them finish their tour.

I voted yes, and am really happy the rest of you fellas voted it down, enjoy the constant increase and rape of your asset.
 


Obi-Wan

Founding Member
Founding Member
Thread starter
Joined
May 15, 2015
Posts
8,901
Likes
5,641
Points
933
Location
Bismarck
I would not let them into my house, however mrs johnr did, and then she called me while they were touring my house, I asked her to put me on the speaker phone, and screamed get out of my house.
mrs johnr apologized, and let them finish their tour.

I voted yes, and am really happy the rest of you fellas voted it down, enjoy the constant increase and rape of your asset.
Now that the gov has seized all those bottles of Diddy's lube I hope they distribute it to property owners to lessen the pain from the ass fkn we are about to get.
 

Rowdie

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 15, 2015
Posts
12,672
Likes
5,798
Points
938
Unless your land is in trust and untaxable, it's never really yours. If you don't pay the property tax, big brother will just take it from you. We're just one generation away from educating the masses to think like a Marxist and they'll vote for anything they're told too. Inheritance tax is another way they will take your land, they're already trying it in Europe.
 

Trip McNeely

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
1,816
Likes
1,136
Points
433
Location
Burleigh county
Congrats to all who voted no and are about to be shocked that nothing substantial will be done and the increase will continue. Let’s reconvene next year and have this same discussion again until it’s voted down again 51-49. For representative purposes you are the white girl on the couch. The fine young gentleman represents government. Enjoy
IMG_0257.jpeg
 

Allen

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
10,987
Likes
2,175
Points
758
Location
Lincoln, kinda...
Unless your land is in trust and untaxable, it's never really yours. If you don't pay the property tax, big brother will just take it from you. We're just one generation away from educating the masses to think like a Marxist and they'll vote for anything they're told too. Inheritance tax is another way they will take your land, they're already trying it in Europe.

Just so we're clear on inheritance, or estate taxes. There is no such animal until you hit an estate value of $13.61 million for a single person who passes away.

The exemption is $27.22 million for a married couple.

For the record, not many of us will ever pay a dime in estate/inheritance tax to the federal government. However, if you do have to pay estate taxes on an estate above the respective limits, it starts at 18% for the first dollar above the exemption and reaches 40% once you have an estate worth $1 million above the exempted amount.
 


Retired-Guy

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Oct 5, 2015
Posts
1,030
Likes
155
Points
253
Location
Bismarck
I would not let them into my house, however mrs johnr did, and then she called me while they were touring my house, I asked her to put me on the speaker phone, and screamed get out of my house.
mrs johnr apologized, and let them finish their tour.

I voted yes, and am really happy the rest of you fellas voted it down, enjoy the constant increase and rape of your asset.
So do you think that the inspection raised your appraised value?
 

tikkalover

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 10, 2015
Posts
8,211
Likes
1,329
Points
558
Location
Minot
The city just paid another $50,000 to the company investigating the Minot police chief for a total of $100,000. It would be cheaper just to fire him.

Was just announced on the news that the city of Minot will pay $3.5 million to cover their share of the cost to replace the bridge in Velva because the 1.5 billion they are spending on the flood enhancement project will increase the flow of the river and the downstream city needs a new bridge to handle the faster flow. 🤬

This will open up a can of worms and the city of Minot will have to kick money in for every down steam city and bridge from here to Canada.

THE SPENDING HAS ALREADY GOTTEN WORSE AFTER YOU PEOPLE VOTED TO KEEP PROPERTY TAXS.
 
Last edited:


Migrator Man

★★★★★ Legendary Member
Joined
Feb 3, 2016
Posts
3,970
Likes
30
Points
261
I have stated before in this thread that I had one of my vacant lots with no water, sewer, power, etc increase in value from $600 to $19,700 in three years. That is a 3,167% increase in value!
Death by taxes, I know with lots that have quit paying taxes on their lots because the lots are not big enough to build on or have water sewer lines run. Even habitat for humanity won’t take them for free. The government still thinks they are worth thousands and won’t even let you build a shop on it without a house. Such a sham.
 

johnr

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 24, 2015
Posts
20,663
Likes
5,286
Points
913
Location
Dickinson
Have fun now that nothing will change to our property taxes! We had a chance but thought the stays quo was good enough to leave in place…..
It is known as the beaten wife syndrome, lets keep the beatings coming, because I don't think I can do any better....

Sad bunch of pussies in this here state...
 

MarbleEyez

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Posts
856
Likes
62
Points
213
There are too many negatives than positives as it was currently written. How are any of the lower populated counties going to get their funds needed to operate their county? There is A LOT more to it than people getting to save a couple dollars on property tax. For those of us who do not live in a larger populated county, we do not have squat for sales tax revenue. We can't just dip into another revenue source to cover the high costs of having to replace a bridge or do any type of "emergency maintenance". How are we supposed to fund our Schools?

There wasn't a single person that sat on any school board or country commission, in our area, that saw this as a good idea. And the entire reason was the un-knowns on how the rural areas would receive their funding.
 


Trip McNeely

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
May 16, 2015
Posts
1,816
Likes
1,136
Points
433
Location
Burleigh county
There are too many negatives than positives as it was currently written. How are any of the lower populated counties going to get their funds needed to operate their county? There is A LOT more to it than people getting to save a couple dollars on property tax. For those of us who do not live in a larger populated county, we do not have squat for sales tax revenue. We can't just dip into another revenue source to cover the high costs of having to replace a bridge or do any type of "emergency maintenance". How are we supposed to fund our Schools?

There wasn't a single person that sat on any school board or country commission, in our area, that saw this as a good idea. And the entire reason was the un-knowns on how the rural areas would receive their funding.
Where do the funds come from now for emergency maintenance? The measure clearly stated all revenue as of 25’ would be replaced by the state moving forward. Any additional revenues each district would have control over to raise what they need through whatever method they choose. So if you were to still have the same money as you always did….. and are worried about extra funds…. Whwre do all these extra funds come from now if you can’t raise them locally? Im pretty confused by your logic….. if you were to get the same money as you’ve always been getting by the state replacing local collections….. but now are worried about raising extra money for emergency situations…. Who is paying for rhe emergency funding now? Is the state paying for it? Are other people paying for it? Whose money is paying for it? I just shake my head at some of the local control people rejecting local control. the measure literally was replacing the money you have yearly and now opening up all the tools to the local districts to raise capital for their own want list with a tax base that is no longer getting taxed for property. Im actually really confused why small communities wouldn’t jump all over it. We get 100% of our funding. And since no one is getting taxed now we can put a small fee or there and raise our funds for whatever we want 🤷🏼 are small communities not wanting to pay for their own wants and needs? Help me understand this logic
 

MarbleEyez

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Jul 15, 2015
Posts
856
Likes
62
Points
213
There was no definite explanation on how funds were going to be appropriated, other than "the state will replace the funds".

I talked to several school board presidents, 2 county commissioners and several city council members. And there wasn't a single person in favor of it due to the vague explanation on how funds were going to be re-appropriated back to local communities and their subsidiaries.
 

lunkerslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
20,604
Likes
4,719
Points
883
Location
Cavalier, ND
Again who will stop big investment groups like Blackrock, Bill gates, China, or vanguard from coming to the only state to not have a property tax? So say property tax.is abolished does the oil tax revenue take some pressure off of counties like Steele County which is one of the poorest in the state? All the slum lord property owners can keep building low income housing apartments that we still will pay for only for the property owners will keep getting richer. Again property tax issues is a local issue and not a state wide issue.
 

lunkerslayer

Founding Member
Founding Member
Joined
Apr 12, 2015
Posts
20,604
Likes
4,719
Points
883
Location
Cavalier, ND
The city just paid another $50,000 to the company investigating the Minot police chief for a total of $100,000. It would be cheaper just to fire him.

Was just announced on the news that the city of Minot will pay $3.5 million to cover their share of the cost to replace the bridge in Velva because the 1.5 billion they are spending on the flood enhancement project will increase the flow of the river and the downstream city needs a new bridge to handle the faster flow. 🤬

This will open up a can of worms and the city of Minot will have to kick money in for every down steam city and bridge from here to Canada.

THE SPENDING HAS ALREADY GOTTEN WORSE AFTER YOU PEOPLE VOTED TO KEEP PROPERTY TAXS.
https://www.minotdailynews.com/news/local-news/2024/11/city-to-seek-future-federal-funds/
 


Recent Posts

Friends of NDA

Top Posters of the Month

  • This month: 423
  • This month: 393
  • This month: 130
  • This month: 121
  • This month: 119
  • This month: 112
  • This month: 96
  • This month: 89
  • This month: 85
  • This month: 75
Top Bottom